Everything Is A Lie: The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At
An All Time High
http://preventdisease.com/news/10/081010_everything_is_a_lie.shtml
From pollution to politics, the era of deception and duplicity has
reached new heights and hijacked almost every form of media in the world.
In the last frontiers for truth such as the internet, disinformation
operations are in full swing to discredit and destroy any semblance
of authentic and factual information available to the public.
How many more lies will people around the world accept as truth? Some
say a global awakening is taking place, but at what cost? Will it take
the destruction of most of the earth and its resources before people
are enlightened?
The escalating media and political reports are so far fetched, cunning,
and so beyond reality, it's as if each is trying to top the other with
one sinister plot after the next. To demonstrate the outright lies by
national governments and the media, let's take three examples from the
last year alone, including the H1N1 scandal, airport body scanners and
the BP oil disaster.
The H1N1 Scandal
Last year, the H1N1 scandal reached its pinnacle in the fall of 2009
when the world united on the internet with a consensus and practical
understanding of the World Health Organization's orchestratration to
deceive the masses. From radio, internet, television, newspapers, magazines,
outdoor posters, signage and promotions, you could not escape the flu
hype campaigns so diligently pursued by all the malicious agendas at
play who only wanted one thing - to promote a dangerous H1N1 vaccine.
After hundreds of reports exposed the criminal activity by all levels
of government, we left the same people in power to do it all over again.
According to preliminary reports, another round of pandemic vaccine
campaigns are scheduled for the 2010/2011 season and they're already
underway. However, there appears to be a recombination that has changed
the H1N1 lab created virus into a more lethal form and it is not a hoax,
but it may be yet another CDC lab experiment.
The CDC has recently issued a Health Advisory in connection with two
summer outbreaks of H3N2 in Iowa. Other reports from Russia and India
indicate that a real epidemic may be upon us if the virus steadily recombines
and acquires new genetics. Even though a new strain may have accidentally
evolved in eggs, reassortment of H1N1-H5N1 has been a legitimate concern
for years. The WHO first suggested the reassortment of H1N1-H5N1 in
2004.
If this is really the case, how will the public react after all the
lies from health agencies who have sworn to protect us? Will they hype
another vaccine and if so, will the public even respond?
Body Scanners
They've been approved all over the world and marketed as the next greatest
airport scanning technology. The U.S., U.K., Russia, Australia, Europe
and Canada have all installed airport body scanners which have potentially
devastating health effects.
Many of these scanners are reportedly using terahertz (THz) waves,
the radiation that fills the slot in the electromagnetic spectrum between
microwaves and infrared. Evidence suggests that although the forces
generated are tiny, resonant effects allow THz waves to unzip double-stranded
DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly
interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication.
As the path toward rolling out wider use of whole-body scanners in
U.S. airports ran through the White House, Obama expedited their deployment
because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) didn't need legislation from Congress
to start using the devices at any of the 560 U.S. airports.
The White House ignored all the scientific evidence presented which
suggested negative health effects. Politicians and regulatory agencies
then covered up the bad publicity on naked body scanners and focused
on the presumed benefits under the guise of public safety.
Privacy commisioners and airport authorities have also insisted that
there were no risks of images being stored or personal details being
revealed to security screeners. Now there's new evidence to show that
the scanners can do just that.
According to a CNET report, another federal agency, the U.S. Marshall's
service, admitted that it had actually stored over 30,000 images recorded
by a full-body scanner used at a Florida courthouse.
A watchdog group called the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
obtained over 100 of the images and states on its web site that, "The
images, which are routinely captured by the federal agency, prove that
body scanning devices store and record images of individuals stripped
naked." The group has filed a lawsuit to suspend the deployment
of body scanners at airports.
EPIC also discovered that the TSA actually specified to manufacturers
that the machines have the ability to send and store images. The TSA
says that these functions are only for testing and training and insists
on its web site that the airport body scanners are delivered to airports
with storage and recording functions disabled.
Again, the upper levels of the echelon are caught lying and deceiving,
yet they are still left to their own devices to further manipulate and
continue misrepresenting facts to the gullible public.
BP Oil Disaster
When news unfolded about the April 20, 2010 BP oil disaster, it went
from bad to worse. Instead of immediately mobilizing for action in the
face of a massive public health threat, the response was to cover-up,
deny and respond with ignorance. After all the public will always believe
them, or so they thought.
The Obama administration, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, U.S. Coast
Guard commandant admiral Thad Allen, energy and climate-change policy
adviser Carol Browner, BP and all their contituents conspired to deliberately
mislead the public from the inception of the disaster to present day.
What's worse is they all agreed to further disseminate toxins in the
Gulf by spraying 1.8 to 2 million gallons of the neurotoxin Corexit
which was exposed by over a hundred scientists, toxicologists and other
experts who have unequivocally classified the irresponsible aerial spraying
of the chemical dispersant as a large-scale, uncontrolled non-consensual
human and environmental experiment is being conducted in the Gulf region.
The media was grossly censoring the extent of the devastation in the
Gulf. The poisons--oil and corexit are destined to spread globally,
but honest reporting was and still is restricted, and many independent
investigators have been arrested. Read 30 Facts Evidencing that The
Gulf Oil Crisis Was Planned.
On June 12, 2010, The Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate
(ISAC) released "Risk of Global Climate Change By BP Oil Spill",
a document detailing how the BP spill may cause irreparable damage to
the Gulf Stream global climate thermoregulation activity. Read Gulf
Loop Current Destroyed: May Lead To Shut Down of Atlantic Thermoregulation,
Rapid Cooling.
According to Dr. Gianluigi Zangari, an Italian theoretical physicist,
and major complex and chaotic systems analyst at the Frascati National
Laboratories in Italy, the Loop Current in the Gulf of Mexico has stalled
as a consequence of the BP oil spill disaster. Zangari notes that the
effects of this stall have also begun to spread to the Gulf Stream.
This is because the Loop Current is a crucial element of the Gulf Stream
itself and why it is commonly referred to as the “main engine”
of the Stream.
The concern now, is whether or not natural processes can re-establish
the stalled Loop Current. If not, we could begin to see global crop
failures as early as 2011.
Zangari's assessment is based on daily monitoring of real-time data
oceanographic satellite public data feeds called “Real-Time Mesoscale
Altimetry” from the Jason, Topex/Poseidon, Geosat, Follow-On, ERS-2
and Envisat satellites.
These satellite feeds are captured and made publicly available by NASA,
NOAA and by the Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research (CCAR) at
the University of Colorado at Boulder.
The CCAR is now being accused of scientific fraud and tampering of
data directly associated with the events surrounding the Loop Current
phenomenon and its current anomalies. Various reporters have spear-headed
the charge including radio personality Dr. Bill Deagle who has featured
Dr. Zangari on his radio show The Nutrimedical Report where he detailed
the events leading up to the destruction of the Loop Current in the
Gulf.
Dr. Zangari has stated that he will no longer use CCAR data due to
its unreliability.
Organized and Professional Disformation Operations
Well-funded and highly-organized disinformation operations are in full-swing
throughout the internet. From forums to comment boards and even professional
websites that have only one purpose: Defame, distract, and destroy the
truth.
However organized, the tactics are very predictable in a world filled
with lies and half-truths. This, sadly, includes every day news media,
one of the worst offenders with respect to being a source of disinformation.
Disinformation campaigns are launched against those seeking to uncover
and expose the truth and/or the conspiracy. The H1N1 scandal was a prime
example of how hundreds of operations can be launched to sway opinions
on the facts. For every fact-based article on the realities of the H1N1
vaccine, there were both very primitive and sophisticated counters on
message boards, comment forums and hundreds of alternative and mainstream
websites.
Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch.com and supporters such as skeptic.org.uk
and skepticblog.com are examples of websites who promote both synthetic
and organic disinformation on almost any topic that does not concur
with mainstream thought.
There are specific tactics which disinfo artists tend to apply, as
H. Michael Sweeney has brilliantly detailed. Also included with this
material are eight common traits of the disinfo artist which may also
prove useful in identifying players and motives. The more a particular
party fits the traits and is guilty of following the rules, the more
likely they are a professional disinfo artist with a vested motive.
People can be bought, threatened, or blackmailed into providing disinformation,
so even "good guys" can be suspect in many cases.
A rational person participating as one interested in the truth will
evaluate that chain of evidence and conclude either that the links are
solid and conclusive, that one or more links are weak and need further
development before conclusion can be arrived at, or that one or more
links can be broken, usually invalidating (but not necessarily so, if
parallel links already exist or can be found, or if a particular link
was merely supportive, but not in itself key) the argument. The game
is played by raising issues which either strengthen or weaken (preferably
to the point of breaking) these links. It is the job of a disinfo artist
to interfere with these evaluation... to at least make people think
the links are weak or broken when, in truth, they are not... or to propose
alternative solutions leading away from the truth. Often, by simply
impeding and slowing down the process through disinformation tactics,
a level of victory is assured because apathy increases with time and
rhetoric.
It would seem true in almost every instance, that if one cannot break
the chain of evidence for a given solution, revelation of truth has
won out. If the chain is broken either a new link must be forged, or
a whole new chain developed, or the solution is invalid an a new one
must be found... but truth still wins out. There is no shame in being
the creator or supporter of a failed solution, chain, or link, if done
with honesty in search of the truth. This is the rational approach.
While it is understandable that a person can become emotionally involved
with a particular side of a given issue, it is really unimportant who
wins, as long as truth wins. But the disinfo artist will seek to emotionalize
and chastise any failure (real or false claims thereof), and will seek
by means of intimidation to prevent discussion in general.
It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their strings (those
who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent
rational and complete examination of any chain of evidence which would
hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must
be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the
art of lies and deceit, such as the intelligence community and the professional
criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend
to apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process. However,
the public at large is not well armed against such weapons, and is often
easily led astray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even
media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues.
For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules
of the game.
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.
Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you
are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't
happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant.
Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which
can be used to show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct
group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers.
Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue
or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms
mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works
especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public
can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can
associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it
a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have
no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man.
Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which
you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent
to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based
on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation,
or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance
and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real
and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real
issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule.
This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though
other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents
with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing',
'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists',
'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others
shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid
dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run.
In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent
position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply
ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor
environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon
without having to explain criticism reasoning -- simply make an accusation
or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent
response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
7. Question motives.
Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent
operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids
discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority.
Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present
your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are
'one who knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues
or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb.
No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing
issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense,
provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a
conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news.
A derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter
of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be
or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future
should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen,
have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early
on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless
of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated
with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without
need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent
is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions.
Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road'
and 'confess' with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight,
was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow
it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just
isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even
publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already
'done the right thing.' Done properly, this can garner sympathy and
respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without
addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution.
Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and
the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too
complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to
begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual
issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic.
Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent
deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions.
Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand
completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule
10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions.
This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency
conclusions in place.
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses.
If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address
the issue.
17. Change the subject.
Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find
a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments
in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This
works especially well with companions who can 'argue' with you over
the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing
more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents.
If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw
them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish
and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less
coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first
instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue,
you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive
they are to criticism.'
19. Ignore facts presented, demand impossible proofs.
This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what
material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the
material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent
to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something
which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder
weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required
that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as
valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that
statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning
or relevance.
20. False evidence.
Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured
to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize
sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime
was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot
be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative
body.
Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all
sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence
and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance,
if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears
no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to
subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the
matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique
is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain
charges when seeking to frame a victim.
22. Manufacture a new truth.
Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence
existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative,
or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way,
if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions.
If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive
issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events
such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to
distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics.
If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from
circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address
issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention,
blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail
information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally,
or severely damaging their health.
25. Vanish.
If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated
and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate
the kitchen.
Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
1) Avoidance
They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive
input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather,
they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about
their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the
matter without any further justification for credibility.
2) Selectivity
They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the
hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents,
or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly
address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success,
the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.
3) Coincidental
They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new
controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general
discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend
to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were
likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with
the reason.
4) Teamwork
They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs
or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum,
but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of
this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players
will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or
other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
5) Anti-conspiratorial
They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually,
for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself
why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus
on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies?
One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone
on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain.
Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for
their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.
6) Artificial Emotions
An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin
-- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming
criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community
training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything,
and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for
a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people,
if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout
their rebuttal.
But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and
are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually
more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and
they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a
communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation.
You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the
next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being
thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their
job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without
any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that
game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others
think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and
so forth, or simply give up.
7) Inconsistent
There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives.
This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat
'freudian', so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side
of truth deep within.
I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information
which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player
claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills
(spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school
education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college
degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation
but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.
8) Time Constant
There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the
government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:
- ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in
an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players
can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity
to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER
SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed
towards truth.
- When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such
as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of
a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response
strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get permission'
or instruction from a formal chain of command.
- In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger
guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team
approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth
seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect
to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be
attacked twice for the same sin.
Remarkably, not even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED
to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves
understand the rules of the game.
Marco Torres is a research specialist, writer and consumer advocate
for healthy lifestyles. He holds degrees in Public Health and Environmental
Science and is a professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention,
environmental toxins and health policy.
|
