Cell Psychology and Beyond
by Bruce H. Lipton, Ph.D. - 2002
The
evolutionary transition from unicellular life forms to multicellular (communal)
life forms represented an intellectually and technically profound high
point in the creation of the biosphere. In the world of unicellular protozoa,
each cell is an innately intelligent, independent being, adjusting its
biology to its own perception of the environment. However, when cells
join together to form multicellular "communities," it required
that the cells establish a complex social intercourse.
Within a community, individual cells can not behave independently, otherwise
the community would cease to exist. By definition, the members of a community
must follow a single "collective" voice. The "collective"
voice controlling the community's expression represents the sum of
all of the perceptions of every cell in the group. Original cellular communities
consisted of from tens to hundreds of cells. The evolutionary advantage
to living in community soon led to organizations comprised of millions,
billions or even trillions, of socially interactive single cells. In order
to survive at such high densities, the amazing technologies evolved by
the cells led to highly structured environments that would boggle the
minds and imagination of human engineers. Within these environments, cell
communities subdivide the workload among themselves, leading to the creation
of hundreds of specialized cell types. The structural plans to create
these interactive communities and differentiated cells are written into
the genome of each cell within the community.
Though each individual cell is of microscopic dimensions, the size of
multicellular communities may range from the barely visible to the monolithic
in proportion . At our level of perspective, we do not observe individual
cells but we do recognize the different structural forms cell communities
acquire. We perceive these macroscopic structured communities as plants
and animals, which includes ourselves among them. While you might consider
yourself as a single entity, in truth your are the sum of a community
of approximately 50 trillion single cells.
The effectiveness of such large communities is enhanced by the subdivision
of labor among the component cells. Cytological specialization's enable
the cells to form the specific tissues and organs of the body. In larger
organisms, only a small percent of the cells function in perceiving the
community's external environment. Groups of specialized "perception
cells" form the tissues and organs of the nervous system. The function
of the nervous system is to perceive the environment and coordinate the
cellular community's biological response to the impinging environmental
stimuli. Multicellular organisms, like the cells they are comprised of,
are genetically endowed with fundamental protein perception complexes
that enable the organism to effectively survive in their environment [for
review, see: Insight into Cellular Consciousness, by B. H. Lipton, Bridges
(ISSSEEM journal), 2001 Vol. 12(1):5]. Genetically programmed perceptions
are referred to as instincts. Similar to cells, organisms are also capable
of interacting with the environment and creating new perceptual pathways.
This process provides for learned behavior.
As one ascends the tree of evolution, moving from more primitive to
more advanced multicellular organisms, there is a profound shift from
the predominant use of genetically programmed perceptions (instinct) to
the use of learned behavior. Primitive organisms primarily rely upon instincts
for the greater proportion of their behavioral repertoire. In higher organisms,
especially humans, brain evolution offers a great opportunity for creating
a large database of learned perceptions, which reduces dependence upon
instincts.
Humans are endowed with an abundance of genetically propagated vital
instincts. Most of them are not evident to us, for they operate below
our level of consciousness, providing for the function and maintenance
of cells, tissues and organs. However, some basic instincts generate overt
and observable behavior. For example, the suckling response of the neonate,
or the retraction of a hand when a finger gets burned in a flame.
"Human beings are more dependent on learning for survival than
other species. We have no instincts that automatically protect us and
find us food and shelter, for example." (Schultz and Lavenda, 1987)
As important as instincts are to our survival, our learned perceptions
are more important, especially in light of the fact that they can override
genetically programmed instincts. Since perceptions direct gene activity
and engage behavior, the learned perceptions we acquire are instrumental
in "controlling" the physiologic and behavioral character of
our lives. The sum of our instincts and learned perceptions collectively
form the subconscious mind, which in turn, is the source of the "collective"
voice that our cell's "agreed" to follow. Although
we are endowed at conception with innate perceptions (instincts) we only
begin to acquire learned perceptions at the time that our nervous systems
become functional. Until recently, conventional thought held that the
human brain was not functional until some time after birth, in that many
of its structures are not fully differentiated (developed) until that
time.
However, this assumption has been invalidated by the pioneering work
of Thomas Verny (1981) and David Chamberlain (1988), among others, who
have revealed the vast sensory and learning capabilities expressed by
the fetal nervous system. The significance of this understanding is that
perceptions experienced by the fetus would have a profound effect upon
its physiology and development. Essentially, the perceptions experienced
by the fetus are the same as those experienced by the mother. Fetal blood
is in direct contact with the mother' s blood via the placenta. Blood
is one of the most important components of the connective tissue, through
it pass most of the organizing factors (e.g., hormones, growth factors,
cytokines) that coordinate the function of the body's systems. As
the mother responds to her perceptions of the environment, her nervous
system activates the release of behavior-coordinating signals into her
bloodstream. These regulatory signals control the function, and even gene
activity, of the tissues and organs needed by her to engage in the required
behavioral response. For example, if a mother is under environmental stress,
she will activate her adrenal system, a protection system that provides
for fight or flight. These stress hormones released into the blood prepare
the body to engage a protection response. In this process, blood vessels
in the viscera constrict forcing blood to nourish the peripheral muscles
and bones that provide protection. Fight-or-flight responses depend upon
reflex behavior (hindbrain) rather than conscious reasoning (forebrain).
To facilitate this process, the stress hormones constrict the forebrain's
blood vessels forcing more blood to go to the hind brain in support of
reflex behavior functions. Constriction of blood vessels in the gut and
forebrain during a stress response respectively repress growth and conscious
reasoning (intelligence).
It is now recognized that, along with nutrients, stress signals and
other coordinating factors in the mother's blood cross the placenta
and enter into the fetal system (Christensen 2000). Once these maternal
regulatory signals enter the fetal blood stream, they affect the same
target systems in the fetus as they did in the mother. The fetus simultaneously
experiences what the mother is perceiving in regard to her environmental
stimuli. In stressful environments, fetal blood preferentially flows to
the muscles and hind brain, while shorting the flow to the viscera and
the forebrain. The development of fetal tissues and organs is proportional
to the amount of blood they receive. Consequently, a mother experiencing
chronic stress will profoundly alter the development of her child's
physiologic systems that provide for growth and protection. The learned
perceptions acquired by an individual begin to arise in utero and can
be subdivided into two broad categories. One set of outward-directed learned
perceptions "control" how we respond to environmental stimuli.
Nature has created a mechanism to facilitate this early learning process.
Upon encountering a novel environmental stimulus, the neonate is programmed
to first observe how the mother or father responds to the signal. Infants
are particularly adept at interpreting parental facial characters in discriminating
the positive or negative nature of a new stimulus. When an infant encounters
new environmental features, it generally focuses first on the parent's
expression in learning how to respond.
Once the new environmental feature is recognized, it is coupled with
an appropriate behavioral response. The coupled input (environmental stimulus)
and output (behavioral response) program is stored in the subconscious
as a learned perception. If the stimulus ever reappears, the "programmed"
behavior encoded by the subconscious perception is immediately engaged.
Behavior is based upon a simple stimulus-response mechanism. Outwardly-directed
learned perceptions are created in response to everything from simple
objects to complex social interactions. Collectively, these learned perceptions
contribute to an individual's enculturation. Parental "programming"
of a child's subconscious behavior enables that child to conform with
the "collective" voice, or beliefs, of the community. In addition
to the outward-directed perceptions, humans also acquire inward-directed
perceptions which provide us with beliefs about our "self-identity."
In order to know more about ourselves, we learn to see ourselves as others
see us. If a parent provides a child with a positive or negative self
image, that perception is recorded in the child's subconscious. The
image acquired of self becomes the subconscious "collective"
voice which shapes our physiology (e.g., health characteristics, weight)
and behavior. Though every cell is innately intelligent, by communal agreement,
it will give its allegiance to the collective voice, even if that voice
engages in self destructive activities. For example, if a child is given
a perception of itself that it can succeed, it will continuously strive
to do just that. However, if the same child was provided with a belief
that it was "not good enough," the body must conform to that
perception, even by using self-sabotage if necessary, in order to thwart
success. Human biology is so dependent upon learned perceptions, that
it is not surprising evolution has provided us with a mechanism that encourages
rapid learning. Brain activity and states of awareness can be measured
electronically using electroencephalography (EEG). There are four fundamental
states of awareness distinguished by the frequency of electromagnetic
activity in the brain. The time that an individual spends in each of these
EEG states is related to a patterned sequential expressed during child
development (R. Laibow, 1999, Medical applications of neurofeedback, in
Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback; James R. Evans and Andrew Abarbanel,
eds., San Diego, Academic Press).
Delta waves (0.5-4 Hz), the lowest level of activity, are primarily
expressed between birth and two years of age. When a person is in delta,
they are in an unconscious (sleep-like) state. Between two years and six
years of age, the child begins to spend more of its time in a higher level
of EEG activity characterized as theta (4-8 Hz). Theta activity is the
state we experience upon just arising, when we are half asleep and half
awake. Children are in this very imaginative state when they play, creating
delicious pies made out of mud or gallant steeds from old brooms.
The child begins to preferentially express a still higher level of EEG
activity called alpha waves around the age of six. Alpha (8-12 Hz) is
associated with states of calm consciousness. At around 12 years, the
child' s EEG spectrum may express sustained periods of beta (12-35
Hz) waves, the highest level of brain activity characterized as "active
or focused consciousness." The significance of this developmental
spectrum is that an individual does not generally sustain active consciousness
(alpha activity) until after five years of age. Before birth and through
the first five years of life, the infant is primarily in delta and theta,
which represents a hypnogogic state. In order to hypnotize an individual
it is necessary to lower their brain function to these levels of activity.
Consequently, the child is essentially in a hypnotic "trance"
through the first five years of its life. During this time it is downloading
biology-controlling perceptions without even the benefit, or interference,
of conscious discrimination. The potential of a child is "programmed"
into its subconscious mind during this phase of development. Learned
perceptions are "hardwired" as synaptic pathways in the subconscious,
which essentially represents what we recognize as the brain. Consciousness,
which functionally expresses itself with the appearance of alpha waves
at around six years of life, is associated with the most recent addition
to the brain, the prefrontal cortex. Human consciousness is characterized
by an awareness of "self." While most of our senses, such as
eyes, ears and nose, observe the outer world, consciousness resembles
a "sense" that observes the inner workings of its own cellular
community. Consciousness feels the sensations and emotions generated by
the body and has access to the stored data base comprising our perceptual
library. To understand the difference between subconscious and consciousness,
consider this instructive relationship: The subconscious mind represents
the brain's hard drive (ROM), and the conscious mind is the equivalent
of the "desktop" (RAM). Like a hard disk, the subconscious can
store an unimaginable quantity of perceptual data. It can be programmed
to be "on line," meaning that incoming signals go directly to
the data base and are processed without the necessity of conscious intervention.
By the time consciousness evolves to a functional state, most of the fundamental
perceptions about life have been programmed into the hard drive. Consciousness
can access this data base and open up for review a formerly learned perception,
such as a behavioral script. This would be the same as opening up a document
from the hard drive on to the desk top. In consciousness, we have the
ability review the script and edit the program as we see fit, just as
we do with open documents on our computers. However, the editing process
in no way changes the original perception which is still hardwired in
the subconscious. No amount of yelling or cajoling by the consciousness
can change the subconscious program. For some reason we think there is
an entity in the subconscious that listens and responds to our thoughts.
In reality the subconscious is a cold, emotionless database of stored
programs. Its function is strictly concerned with reading environmental
signals and engaging the hard wired behavior programs, no questions asked,
no judgments made.
Through sheer will power and intent, consciousness can attempt to override
a subconscious tape. Usually such efforts are met with varying degrees
of resistance, since the cells are obligated to adhere to the subconscious
program. In some cases the tensions between conscious will power and subconscious
programs can result in serious neurological disorders. For example, consider
the fate of Australian concert pianist David Helfgott whose story was
presented in the film Shine. David was programmed by his father, a survivor
of the holocaust, to not succeed, for success would make him vulnerable
in that he would stand out from others. In spite of the relentlessness
of his father's programming, David was consciously aware that he was
a world class pianist. In order to prove himself, Helfgott purposely chose
one of the most difficult piano compositions, a piece by Rachmaninoff,
to play in the national competition. As the film reveals, in the final
stage of his amazing performance, a major conflict occurred between his
conscious will to succeed and the subconscious program to fail. When he
successfully played the last note he passed out, upon awakening he was
irreparably insane. The fact that his conscious will power forced his
body mechanism to violate the programmed "collective" voice
led to a neurological melt down. The conflicts we generally experience
in life are frequently related to our conscious efforts of trying to "force"
changes upon our subconscious programming. However, through a variety
of new energy psychology modalities (e.g., Psych-K, see www.psych-k.com)
the content of subconscious beliefs can be assessed and using specific
protocols, consciousness can facilitate a rapid "reprogramming"
of limiting core beliefs.
Bruce H. Lipton, Ph.D., scientist and lecturer, formerly
served as Associate Professor of Anatomy in the School of Medicine at
the University of Wisconsin (Madison, 1973-1982), participating in the
medical curriculum as a lecturer in Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology.
His laboratory research on muscular dystrophy focused on the behavior
and cell biology of cloned human muscle cells. Subsequently, Dr. Lipton
served as a Research Fellow in the Departments of Pathology and Dermatology
at Stanford University's School of Medicine (1987-1992). Stanford
research on the human immune system yielded insight into the molecular
basis of how perceptions (beliefs) control biological expression. Bruce
left formal academia in 1992 and has since become an internationally recognized
authority in bridging science and spirit. He has been a guest speaker
on numerous radio and television programs, and a sought after keynote
presenter for national organizations.
|