The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
by R. B. Pearson (originally Pasteur, Plagiarist,
Imposter 1942)
See
our full line of Healing Programs
See
our full line of Pain Remedies
PREFACE
1. PRIOR HISTORY OF THE "GERM THEORY"
2 BECHAMP, PASTEUR, AND FERMENTATION
3 VINOUS FERMENTATION
4 BECHAMP'S MICROZYMAS OR `LITTLE BODIES'
5 SILK WORM DISEASE: ANOTHER STEAL!
6 PASTEUR ALSO A FAKER: ANTISEPSIS
7 ARE BIOLOGICALS INJURIOUS?
TUBERCULIN A FRAUD
IMMUNITY IN ANIMALS VACCINATED WITH B.C.G.
BIOLOGICALS MAY DISSOLVE THE RED BLOOD CORPUSCLES
GERMS IN SERUMS MAY ATTACK THE HEART VALVES
8 ANIMAL SEROLOGY: ANTHRAX
FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE
RABIES OR HYDROPHOBIA
PASTEUR'S TREATMENT CAUSES RABIES
THE TUBERCULIN TEST
9 REAL IMMUNITY
PREFACE
It is a rather serious matter to attack the reputation of a famous man, one who has
posed and been accepted as one of the world's greatest scientists. For many years, Pasteur
has been looked upon as a founder and leader in serology; but it is always pertinent to
look into the beginnings of any subject on which there is a difference of opinion, with
the hope of finding the truth in the matter.
The writer has made an effort in his prior books and pamphlets to show that the germ
theory is false, and that illness was practically always due to errors of diet or manner
of living, the germs being present solely as scavengers of dead and waste tissues and
foods, and not as the cause of the disease.
However, the erroneous belief that germs cause disease and must be controlled or
eliminated before it can be cured is so widespread as to close the minds of many people to
any other ideas on this subject.
For this reason it seems that a thorough investigation of this idea, the grounds on
which it is based, and even the bona-fides of those who started it on its way, is
necessary before any sane ideas as to the proper treatment of disease can be widely
promulgated.
When Miss Ethel Douglas Hume brought out Bechamp or Pasteur? in 1923, it appeared to be
just the thing that would fill this gap and end the use of serums and other biologicals
forever. But it is now 19 years since that book, which should have marked an epoch in the
healing arts, appeared. It did not receive the attention it deserved in medical circles
and, though it is now in its second edition,* the medical profession are pushing
biologicals harder than ever.
Hence it seems appropriate to go over the subject in order to show the truth regarding
the falsity of Pasteur's ideas and claims to fame, and the fraudulent basis on which the
germ theory rests, as was so well shown by Miss Hume in B«champ or Pasteur?, and to add
other facts and statistics that support the idea that the germ theory is false, in the
hopes that it may receive wider circulation and more general attention, and possibly lead
to a complete overhauling of the question of the treatment of disease, especially
regarding serology.
The translations from the French, and other material in chapters 2, 3, 4 and 5 not
otherwise credited, are from Beauchamp or Pasteur? by Ethel Douglas Hume.
In closing, I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to the Reverend and Mrs Wilber
Atchison of Chicago for many suggestions and valuable assistance in the preparation of the
manuscript. Miss L. Loat, secretary of the National Anti-Vaccination League of London, has
also been very kind, responding to every request for information with more than could be
used, some of it being especially compiled at the cost of considerable effort.
R. B. Pearson
January 15th, 1942
|