Cell Psychology and Beyond
by Bruce H. Lipton, Ph.D. - 2002
See
our full line of Nutritional Supplements
The
evolutionary transition from unicellular life forms to multicellular (communal)
life forms represented an intellectually and technically profound high point
in the creation of the biosphere. In the world of unicellular protozoa, each
cell is an innately intelligent, independent being, adjusting its biology to
its own perception of the environment. However, when cells join together to
form multicellular "communities," it required that the cells establish
a complex social intercourse.
Within a community, individual cells can not behave independently, otherwise
the community would cease to exist. By definition, the members of a
community must follow a single "collective" voice. The "collective" voice
controlling the community's expression represents the sum of all of the
perceptions of every cell in the group. Original cellular communities
consisted of from tens to hundreds of cells. The evolutionary advantage to
living in community soon led to organizations comprised of millions,
billions or even trillions, of socially interactive single cells. In order
to survive at such high densities, the amazing technologies evolved by the
cells led to highly structured environments that would boggle the minds and
imagination of human engineers. Within these environments, cell communities
subdivide the workload among themselves, leading to the creation of hundreds
of specialized cell types. The structural plans to create these interactive
communities and differentiated cells are written into the genome of each
cell within the community.
Though each individual cell is of microscopic dimensions, the size of
multicellular communities may range from the barely visible to the
monolithic in proportion. At our level of perspective, we do not observe
individual cells but we do recognize the different structural forms cell
communities acquire. We perceive these macroscopic structured communities as
plants and animals, which includes ourselves among them. While you might
consider yourself as a single entity, in truth your are the sum of a
community of approximately 50 trillion single cells.
The effectiveness of such large communities is enhanced by the subdivision
of labor among the component cells. Cytological specialization's enable the
cells to form the specific tissues and organs of the body. In larger
organisms, only a small percent of the cells function in perceiving the
community's external environment. Groups of specialized "perception cells"
form the tissues and organs of the nervous system. The function of the
nervous system is to perceive the environment and coordinate the cellular
community's biological response to the impinging environmental
stimuli. Multicellular organisms, like the cells they are comprised of, are
genetically endowed with fundamental protein perception complexes that
enable the organism to effectively survive in their environment [for review,
see: Insight into Cellular Consciousness, by B. H. Lipton, Bridges (ISSSEEM
journal), 2001 Vol. 12(1):5]. Genetically programmed perceptions are
referred to as instincts. Similar to cells, organisms are also capable of
interacting with the environment and creating new perceptual pathways. This
process provides for learned behavior.
As one ascends the tree of evolution, moving from more primitive to more
advanced multicellular organisms, there is a profound shift from the
predominant use of genetically programmed perceptions (instinct) to the use
of learned behavior. Primitive organisms primarily rely upon instincts for
the greater proportion of their behavioral repertoire. In higher organisms,
especially humans, brain evolution offers a great opportunity for creating a
large database of learned perceptions, which reduces dependence upon
instincts.
Humans are endowed with an abundance of genetically propagated vital
instincts. Most of them are not evident to us, for they operate below our
level of consciousness, providing for the function and maintenance of cells,
tissues and organs. However, some basic instincts generate overt and
observable behavior. For example, the suckling response of the neonate, or
the retraction of a hand when a finger gets burned in a flame.
"Human beings are more dependent on learning for survival than other
species. We have no instincts that automatically protect us and find us food
and shelter, for example." (Schultz and Lavenda, 1987) As important as
instincts are to our survival, our learned perceptions are more important,
especially in light of the fact that they can over-ride genetically
programmed instincts. Since perceptions direct gene activity and engage
behavior, the learned perceptions we acquire are instrumental in
"controlling" the physiologic and behavioral character of our lives. The sum
of our instincts and learned perceptions collectively form the subconscious
mind, which in turn, is the source of the "collective" voice that our cell's
"agreed" to follow. Although we are endowed at conception with innate
perceptions (instincts) we only begin to acquire learned perceptions at the
time that our nervous systems become functional. Until recently,
conventional thought held that the human brain was not functional until some
time after birth, in that many of its structures are not fully
differentiated (developed) until that time.
However, this assumption has
been invalidated by the pioneering work of Thomas Verny (1981) and David
Chamberlain (1988), among others, who have revealed the vast sensory and
learning capabilities expressed by the fetal nervous system.
The significance of this understanding is that perceptions experienced by
the fetus would have a profound effect upon its physiology and development.
Essentially, the perceptions experienced by the fetus are the same as those
experienced by the mother. Fetal blood is in direct contact with the mother'
s blood via the placenta. Blood is one of the most important components of
the connective tissue, through it pass most of the organizing factors (e.g.,
hormones, growth factors, cytokines) that coordinate the function of the
body's systems. As the mother responds to her perceptions of the
environment, her nervous system activates the release of
behavior-coordinating signals into her bloodstream. These regulatory signals
control the function, and even gene activity, of the tissues and organs
needed by her to engage in the required behavioral response. For example, if
a mother is under environmental stress, she will activate her adrenal
system, a protection system that provides for fight or flight. These stress
hormones released into the blood prepare the body to engage a protection
response. In this process, blood vessels in the viscera constrict forcing
blood to nourish the peripheral muscles and bones that provide protection.
Fight-or-flight responses depend upon reflex behavior (hindbrain) rather
than conscious reasoning (forebrain). To facilitate this process, the stress
hormones constrict the forebrain's blood vessels forcing more blood to go to
the hind brain in support of reflex behavior functions. Constriction of
blood vessels in the gut and forebrain during a stress response respectively
repress growth and conscious reasoning (intelligence).
It is now recognized that, along with nutrients, stress signals and other
coordinating factors in the mother's blood cross the placenta and enter into
the fetal system (Christensen 2000). Once these maternal regulatory signals
enter the fetal blood stream, they affect the same target systems in the
fetus as they did in the mother. The fetus simultaneously experiences what
the mother is perceiving in regard to her environmental stimuli. In
stressful environments, fetal blood preferentially flows to the muscles and
hind brain, while shorting the flow to the viscera and the forebrain. The
development of fetal tissues and organs is proportional to the amount of
blood they receive. Consequently, a mother experiencing chronic stress will
profoundly alter the development of her child's physiologic systems that
provide for growth and protection. The learned perceptions acquired by an
individual begin to arise in utero and can be subdivided into two broad
categories. One set of outward-directed learned perceptions "control" how we
respond to environmental stimuli. Nature has created a mechanism to
facilitate this early learning process. Upon encountering a novel
environmental stimulus, the neonate is programmed to first observe how the
mother or father responds to the signal. Infants are particularly adept at
interpreting parental facial characters in discriminating the positive or
negative nature of a new stimulus. When an infant encounters new
environmental features, it generally focuses first on the parent's
expression in learning how to respond.
Once the new environmental feature is
recognized, it is coupled with an appropriate behavioral response. The
coupled input (environmental stimulus) and output (behavioral response)
program is stored in the subconscious as a learned perception. If the
stimulus ever reappears, the "programmed" behavior encoded by the
subconscious perception is immediately engaged. Behavior is based upon a
simple stimulus-response mechanism. Outwardly-directed learned perceptions
are created in response to everything from simple objects to complex social
interactions. Collectively, these learned perceptions contribute to an
individual's enculturation. Parental "programming" of a child's subconscious
behavior enables that child to conform with the "collective" voice, or
beliefs, of the community. In addition to the outward-directed perceptions,
humans also acquire inward-directed perceptions which provide us with
beliefs about our "self-identity." In order to know more about ourselves, we
learn to see ourselves as others see us. If a parent provides a child with a
positive or negative self image, that perception is recorded in the child's
subconscious. The image acquired of self becomes the subconscious
"collective" voice which shapes our physiology (e.g., health
characteristics, weight) and behavior. Though every cell is innately
intelligent, by communal agreement, it will give its allegiance to the
collective voice, even if that voice engages in self destructive activities.
For example, if a child is given a perception of itself that it can succeed,
it will continuously strive to do just that. However, if the same child was
provided with a belief that it was "not good enough," the body must conform
to that perception, even by using self-sabotage if necessary, in order to
thwart success. Human biology is so dependent upon learned perceptions, that
it is not surprising evolution has provided us with a mechanism that
encourages rapid learning. Brain activity and states of awareness can be
measured electronically using electroencephalography (EEG). There are four
fundamental states of awareness distinguished by the frequency of
electromagnetic activity in the brain. The time that an individual spends in
each of these EEG states is related to a patterned sequential expressed
during child development (R. Laibow, 1999, Medical applications of
neurofeedback, in Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback; James R. Evans and
Andrew Abarbanel, eds., San Diego, Academic Press).
Delta waves (0.5-4 Hz), the lowest level of activity, are primarily
expressed between birth and two years of age. When a person is in delta,
they are in an unconscious (sleep-like) state. Between two years and six
years of age, the child begins to spend more of its time in a higher level
of EEG activity characterized as theta (4-8 Hz). Theta activity is the state
we experience upon just arising, when we are half asleep and half awake.
Children are in this very imaginative state when they play, creating
delicious pies made out of mud or gallant steeds from old brooms.
The child begins to preferentially express a still higher level of EEG
activity called alpha waves around the age of six. Alpha (8-12 Hz) is
associated with states of calm consciousness. At around 12 years, the child'
s EEG spectrum may express sustained periods of beta (12-35 Hz) waves, the
highest level of brain activity characterized as "active or focused
consciousness." The significance of this developmental spectrum is that an
individual does not generally sustain active consciousness (alpha activity)
until after five years of age. Before birth and through the first five years
of life, the infant is primarily in delta and theta, which represents a
hypnogogic state. In order to hypnotize an individual it is necessary to
lower their brain function to these levels of activity. Consequently, the
child is essentially in a hypnotic "trance" through the first five years of
its life. During this time it is down-loading biology-controlling
perceptions without even the benefit, or interference, of conscious
discrimination. The potential of a child is "programmed" into its
subconscious mind during this phase of development. Learned perceptions are
"hard-wired" as synaptic pathways in the subconscious, which essentially
represents what we recognize as the brain. Consciousness, which functionally
expresses itself with the appearance of alpha waves at around six years of
life, is associated with the most recent addition to the brain, the
prefrontal cortex. Human consciousness is characterized by an awareness of
"self." While most of our senses, such as eyes, ears and nose, observe the
outer world, consciousness resembles a "sense" that observes the inner
workings of its own cellular community. Consciousness feels the sensations
and emotions generated by the body and has access to the stored data base
comprising our perceptual library. To understand the difference between
subconscious and consciousness, consider this instructive relationship: The
subconscious mind represents the brain's hard drive (ROM), and the conscious
mind is the equivalent of the "desktop" (RAM). Like a hard disk, the
subconscious can store an unimaginable quantity of perceptual data. It can
be programmed to be "on line," meaning that incoming signals go directly to
the data base and are processed without the necessity of conscious
intervention. By the time consciousness evolves to a functional state, most
of the fundamental perceptions about life have been programmed into the hard
drive. Consciousness can access this data base and open up for review a
formerly learned perception, such as a behavioral script. This would be the
same as opening up a document from the hard drive on to the desk top. In
consciousness, we have the ability to review the script and edit the program as
we see fit, just as we do with open documents on our computers. However, the
editing process in no way changes the original perception which is still
hardwired in the subconscious. No amount of yelling or cajoling by the
consciousness can change the subconscious program. For some reason we think
there is an entity in the subconscious that listens and responds to our
thoughts. In reality the subconscious is a cold, emotionless database of
stored programs. Its function is strictly concerned with reading
environmental signals and engaging the hard wired behavior programs, no
questions asked, no judgments made.
Through sheer will power and intent, consciousness can attempt to over-ride
a subconscious tape. Usually such efforts are met with varying degrees
of resistance, since the cells are obligated to adhere to the subconscious
program. In some cases the tensions between conscious will power and
subconscious programs can result in serious neurological disorders.
For example, consider the fate of Australian concert pianist David Helfgott
whose story was presented in the film Shine. David was programmed by
his father, a survivor of the holocaust, to not succeed, for success
would make him vulnerable in that he would stand out from others. In
spite of the relentlessness of his father's programming, David was consciously
aware that he was a world class pianist. In order to prove himself,
Helfgott purposely chose one of the most difficult piano compositions,
a piece by Rachmaninoff, to play in the national competition. As the
film reveals, in the final stage of his amazing performance, a major
conflict occurred between his conscious will to succeed and the subconscious
program to fail. When he successfully played the last note he passed
out, upon awakening he was irreparably insane. The fact that his conscious
will power forced his body mechanism to violate the programmed "collective"
voice led to a neurological melt down. The conflicts we generally experience
in life are frequently related to our conscious efforts of trying to
"force" changes upon our subconscious programming. However,
through a variety of new energy psychology modalities (e.g., Psych-K,
see www.psych-k.com)
the content of subconscious beliefs can be assessed and using specific
protocols, consciousness can facilitate a rapid "reprogramming"
of limiting core beliefs.
Bruce H. Lipton, Ph.D., scientist and lecturer, formerly served as Associate
Professor of Anatomy in the School of Medicine at the University of
Wisconsin (Madison, 1973-1982), participating in the medical curriculum as a
lecturer in Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology. His laboratory research
on muscular dystrophy focused on the behavior and cell biology of cloned
human muscle cells. Subsequently, Dr. Lipton served as a Research Fellow in
the Departments of Pathology and Dermatology at Stanford University's School
of Medicine (1987-1992). Stanford research on the human immune system
yielded insight into the molecular basis of how perceptions (beliefs)
control biological expression. Bruce left formal academia in 1992 and has
since become an internationally recognized authority in bridging science and
spirit. He has been a guest speaker on numerous radio and television
programs, and a sought after keynote presenter for national organizations.
|