Doctors and No Vaccine Families19.09.2008
by Sircus - Mark
Mark Sircus, Ac., OMD, DM (P)
Director International Medical Veritas Association
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine
United Press International released today information about a study at Chicago's Rush University that found that more than one-quarter of pediatricians surveyed would refuse to treat a family that rejected all vaccinations. Dr. Erin Flanagan-Klygis and colleagues surveyed pediatricians who provide routine vaccinations in a primary care setting. Of the 302 pediatricians completing the survey, 85 percent reported encountering a family refusal of at least one vaccine during the previous 12 months and 54 percent reported encountering a parent who refused all vaccines. In the case of parents refusing all vaccines, 28 percent of the pediatricians said they would ask the family to seek care elsewhere.
It is correct for physicians to retain the right to decline patients who will not follow their recommendations. I, for instance, would not begin treatments with anyone who does not start with the very foundation of good medicine, which starts out with Magnesium Chloride and some other basic natural essentials to promote life or what I call Biogenic Medicine.
But is it correct for pediatricians to deny their services to parents who are trying to protect themselves from the insanities of pediatrics? It is unfortunate for everyone that the mainstream doctor listens to the authorities and most often to the pharmaceutical companies who provide them with the information they want them to hear. The doctors often crowd up their practices and are so busy they don't have the time to really look closely at the information beyond what they are told. Combine that with the powerful shadow of the CDC they rely on and its kind of hopeless.
The increase in the amounts of vaccines being developed and implemented for everything under the sun should be a red flag for any parent. It is a difficult situation because parents depend on their pediatrician's advice and counsel in their decision to vaccinate their children. Standing one's ground on medical issues in the face of one's doctors and the entire medical establishment position is not easy but that is exactly what parents need to do. Parents must learn more than the doctors who have their AMA and APA blinders on. It is actually very hard though, to stand your ground in front of most doctors who consider themselves the end all and be all of medicine and medical treatment. True medical wisdom begins actually when we become aware of what we do not know but this is sorely absent today in modern medicine.
Doctors look at you like you are crazy when you refuse something they think you should try. They are dumbfounded when you let them know what the reasons are for our refusal of vaccines and toxic medicines even when we explain that we have seen the studies, the information that is hidden or downplayed by public health officials.
If the pediatricians would at least become more responsible about when they vaccinate, how they vaccinate and who they vaccinate it would help the cause of their integrity a lot. Most pediatricians vaccinate without paying attention to the contraindications. They shoot the kids up with many vaccines even when a child's immune system is compromised, even when strong nutritional deficiencies or illnesses are present.
Many pediatricians seem to have forgotten that "First do no Harm" to the children is their obligatory vow. Parents have no choice but to look out for their families because they cannot trust their pediatricians to do that for them anymore. In today's world, where it is recognized that the great majority of men, women and children are deficient in magnesium, it is medical malpractice to inject vaccines without addressing the deficiency first. The pharmaceutical companies nor the medical schools will inform doctors of this thus it is up to the parents to do that.
Dr. John P. A. Ioannidis, of the Ioannina School of Medicine, Greece, raises the vital question about the falsity of the research doctors and medical authorities rely on. The probability that a research claim is true depends largely on study bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to false assumptions made between studies that are used to reinforce each other. Dr. Ioannidis said, "In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias."[i][i]
Thus medical truth becomes a rare commodity. It gets lost in the shuffle of false studies that are used to support prevailing medical approaches no matter how many people get hurt. Today without some kind of feeling/intuition for what medical truth is or might be we become vulnerable to the purposely generated lies and distortions that come from the people who make the most money from medicine and the pharmaceutical business.